Self-Publishing - Part 3

I've been writing about self-publishing this month. A fabulous tool for those of us who are sick enough to enjoy such things. he he

Last week, I talked about the importance of editing. As in hiring someone else to edit your work for you. If you missed that post, read Self-Publishing - Part 2.

This week, we get to issue #2.

[PLEASE NOTE - This post is specifically with regards to PRINTED self-published books.  E-books are whole different animal, but if you learn to properly format e-books, most of the formatting for printed books will already be done.]

Manuscript Formatting

Multiple things here can cause issues.

1 - Font size. Please, for the sake of those with vision problems, don't use what hubby and I less-than-affectionately refer to as "glorious squinto-vision." If the text isn't large enough to be easy for most readers to read, you'll lose readers. The industry standard for Christian fiction seems to be predominantly Times New Roman 12-point, or the similar font Garamond. I've seen everything from 11 to 13 point font recommended in those two styles. Personally, I use TNR 12-pt to make it easy to read (I'm not a fan of Garamond).  (For large print editions, I use TNR 16-pt.)

If you're using a tiny font to decrease page count, there are other ways to accomplish this than to use a glorious squinto-vision font. Which leads us to the next...

2 - Line spacing. Double or line-and-a-half spacing isn't necessary in the finished product. It's great for editing and such, but it shouldn't be in the final manuscript when it goes to print (or e-book for that matter). Personally, I find it detracts from the professional appearance of the finished book. Single spacing is all you need and is much more professional.

3 - Paragraph style. Issues in this area have been interesting to see as I never thought about or expected it. I use standard paragraphs in my books as I see used in professionally done, traditionally published books. Indented first line on each paragraph. All single spaced. No extra spacing between paragraphs. Here's an example (rough draft, so excuse any grammar/sentence structure boo-boos or bad word choices - this is just an example from one of my MSs for paragraph style purposes):

          “It’s been six days, Lord,” Chase whispered, arms folded across the back of the pew in front of him, forehead resting on his arms. “How much longer?”

Each day, he’d come to the church to pray as evening fell. Each day, he felt the same sense of peace that God had things well in hand. And each day, he wondered how much longer it would be before they received some clue to Jordan’s whereabouts. The answer was always the same.

Be still. Be patient. My time, not yours.

“I’m trying, Lord.” Tears choked his voice. “And I’m trying really hard not to be scared for her. Please, wherever she is, take care of her.”

Here's the above example using block paragraphing:

“It’s been six days, Lord,” Chase whispered, arms folded across the back of the pew in front of him, forehead resting on his arms. “How much longer?”

Each day, he’d come to the church to pray as evening fell. Each day, he felt the same sense of peace that God had things well in hand. And each day, he wondered how much longer it would be before they received some clue to Jordan’s whereabouts. The answer was always the same.

Be still. Be patient. My time, not yours.

“I’m trying, Lord.” Tears choked his voice. “And I’m trying really hard not to be scared for her. Please, wherever she is, take care of her.”

See the difference?  No indent of the first line. To keep the paragraphs straight, you have to add the extra space between paragraphs. This is actually a standard business document paragraph style, not intended for creative uses such as fiction writing. For fiction, it adds extra lines to the manuscript, and thus extra pages. Not necessarily a good thing if you're trying to keep the cost of your book down.

What I see a lot of people doing is combining the two styles, which is distracting and totally unnecessary. Here's the above example combining the two styles as I see in many finished books:

            “It’s been six days, Lord,” Chase whispered, arms folded across the back of the pew in front of him, forehead resting on his arms. “How much longer?”

            Each day, he’d come to the church to pray as evening fell. Each day, he felt the same sense of peace that God had things well in hand. And each day, he wondered how much longer it would be before they received some clue to Jordan’s whereabouts. The answer was always the same.

            Be still. Be patient. My time, not yours.

            “I’m trying, Lord.” Tears choked his voice. “And I’m trying really hard not to be scared for her. Please, wherever she is, take care of her.”

This style makes me cringe as it is not structurally correct for either paragraph type. It's also not professional in appearance and screams "AMATEUR", but MAY only be noticeable to other authors, as well as business professionals like secretaries (such as myself) or any student who has been taught proper paragraph formatting. I'm learning to ignore it (sort of). I'm sure my high school and college typing, business, and English teachers/instructors would have a fit over this one, not to mention how many of my fellow secretaries look at it and, like me, are distracted by a nearly overwhelming desire to fix it.

If you want to publish a book that looks professional, pay attention to how the big boys (traditional publishers) have been doing it for years. Follow their example. If you don't, some segment of your readers are bound to notice. And THAT kind of attention isn't necessarily positive. You want your writing to be noticed, not the unprofessional or problematic formatting you choose for the finished product.

Take a look at your finished manuscript and honestly evaluate these factors. If you intend to do e-books, you'll have a whole different set of formatting criteria to deal with (and paragraph style WILL bite you in the butt when you go to format for e-books if you don't do it right - take it from me). There are some great resources online to show you the dos and don'ts of e-book formatting.

The Passive Guy tends to gather a lot of great information from various blogs on these issues, as well as other aspects of publishing. You might check out his blog, The Passive Voice.

Here's one such article I had to read just because the title made me laugh:

Should You Tell a Writer His Baby's Ugly?

And another one that is rather lengthy but well worth taking the time to go through is Take Pride in Your eBook Formatting. I'm going to have to go through it multiple times myself as there's so much to this series.

I'm sure you'll find lots more, but that should get you started with regards to formatting e-books.

Oh, and something else. For those of you who are trying to save space, one of the things I often see overlooked that can make a difference of several pages over the course of an entire novel is that really annoying "widows & orphans" feature in Word. Do yourself a favor. Disable it. If the MS is already typed, "select all" then go into your paragraph style and turn that feature off. You might be surprised how many pages it saves you, not to mention it gives the book a more professional polish since all your pages will be the same length instead of bottoms looking cut off on some pages.

Anyone else have any tips that might help others avoid the mistakes you or others you know have made?

Self-Publishing - Part 2

Last week I started this series on self-publishing by talking about the pros of self-publishing. If you missed that post, see Self-Publishing - Part 1. I noted at the end of that post that there are two particular areas where I see issues with self-published books. This week, I'll deal with the first of those issues.

Editing

Rampant problems that should have been caught during editing is the number one complaint I hear from self-publishing's detractors as to why self-published books aren't worth reading. When a reader picks up a book and finds multiple, obvious grammar and sentence structure mistakes on page 1, chances are they'll put the book down and not pick it up again. Chances also are they may not give you, as the author, a second chance.

I'm not saying professionally edited books won't and don't contain mistakes or oversights. I see them all the time in traditionally published books, which I know go though professional editing. I read one not long ago from a big-name traditional publisher, in fact, that had so many mistakes in one paragraph that I had a hard time figuring out what was actually being said and what the author intended to say, and there were a handful more on that same page. Only thing I could figure, since most of the rest of the book was fine, is the editor missed that section of the book during edits. (Either that, or their typesetter was REALLY not paying attention at that point.) There were two places like that in the book. Considering the book was almost 300 pages long, that's not bad enough to make me toss the book altogether.

As an author friend of mine noted, it doesn't matter how many eyes you have look at a book, something will probably slip through. So don't expect perfection, no matter how good the edit job is.

That said, hire an editor, or at the very least find a good critique partner who will be honest with you about issues they find, however few or plentiful. Editors are paid to be brutally honest and usually are. (And not all editors are created equal, so make sure you find a good one.) Critique partners may feel the need to spare your feelings. Let them know you don't WANT your feelings spared. You want the truth so you can polish that MS and make it as professional as possible.

A few mistakes or oversights is way different than rampant issues that a second set of eyes on the MS would have caught. I'm the type of reader who will generally power through such problems, no matter how bad they may be, to look at the story and characters. Other readers won't necessarily be so determined, or forgiving. My internal editor may have screaming fits, and I have to restrain my desire to go to town with a green pen (Thank you, Mr. Sullivan, for THAT particular habit *G*). But I'll get through it to see what the meat of the story is.

And take it from me, no matter how many times YOU look over your own work, you're going to miss stuff. I've learned this the hard way. I've been amazed at what obvious stuff my critique partners and editors have caught that I missed, no matter how many times I went over that MS.

So find a good editor or brutally honest critique partner and edit your work! Your readers will love you for it.

Next week, that second issue I often see....

Self-Publishing - Part 1

Photo courtesy of click on morguefile.com

I read self-published books often these days, as I'm sure many others do. There are some incredible stories out there, and they deserve attention. I've also self-published - one fiction novella to this point, but my first full-length novel is in edits right now (and no, I'm not ONLY self-editing, but we'll get to that later) and will be self-published when it's ready.

The pros of self-publishing are easy to figure out. The biggest one is that you retain all rights to and control over your own work. You can do with it what you want when you want without having to get permission from anyone else. Do you need to revise it? Go for it. Want to pull it from the market for some reason? You can do that, too. No permission needed from anyone. Nice, eh? And if a new format type comes out? You can go straight to publication in that format without having a hassle. (This will resonate with those who traditionally published years ago and are having trouble getting publishing rights from their publishers so they can get those books out in e-book formats.)

You're responsible for your own editing, manuscript formatting and cover design. Those can be pros or cons depending on your personality, areas of interest and skills in such matters. Personally, I consider those pros. Others may not. They don't want to deal with finding their own editors, or document formatting, or designing their cover or hiring someone else to do it. For them, I would suggest traditional publication. Traditional publishers take care of all of that for you. That's part of what you pay them for with a share of your royalties. Take advantage of that expertise.

You will make mistakes as a self-publisher. You will learn some things by trial and error, and you'll find as I have that what works for one book or one author may not work at all for you. Keep reading, learning and talking to others to see what you can glean from their experiences - both good and bad. I find this to be a fun part of the whole publication adventure - talking to other authors.

However, there are things self-publishers really should do with regards to the finished product, and I'm seeing problems in these areas. Two areas are special issues. I'll get into those over the next couple of weeks.

What about you? Have you self-published? What did you like or not like about it? Are your books available as e-books, paperback, or both?

Are you considering self-publication? What's drawing your interest in that direction? What would you like to know that might help you avoid some of the pits others have fallen into?